A day at the beach
“It is unfortunate that the course title’s reference to ‘mythologies’ has been misconstrued,” Provost David Shulenburger said in a written statement released Tuesday afternoon. “The terms ‘myth’ and ‘mythology’ are common in the academic study of religion and not an affront. A myth refers to the common use of stories or rituals to symbolize in a meaningful manner the core beliefs of a religion; it does not refer to any religion as a whole.”O'Connor, a candidate for Secretary of State, once came out against women's suffrage.
But some conservatives, such as Sen. Kay O’Connor, R-Olathe, were unmoved.
“Why poke a stick in somebody’s eye if you don’t have to?” she said. “If you’re going to have an intelligent design course and call it mythology, I think in the very least it’s a slap in the face to every Judeo-Christian religion that’s out there.”
And John Altevogt, a conservative columnist and activist in Kansas City, said Tuesday that state officials should require the university to change the name of the Department of Religious Studies to the “Department of Religious Intolerance.”
“If we can’t do that,” Altevogt said, “maybe we settle for some cuts in spending.”
But O’Connor said anything was possible in the Legislature.
“If they press forward in this area and continue to kick sand, the ultimate will be a negative of some sort,” she said. “I don’t know what the negative will be ... You can’t kick sand in someone’s face and then expect a positive. And that’s what this is — a sand-kicking contest.”
Calling IDC a myth is not a slap in the face to any religion. Calling it a science is a slap in the face to us all.