The scientific community has a double standard when it comes to ID and evolution, Dembski said. If scientists can imagine any natural process to explain something, it immediately “trumps” ID, he said, whereas facts are demanded of design researchers.What kind of craziness is that? Demanding facts in a debate about science.
The trick is, scientists don't stop when they propose a way natural processes could produce a result. They figure out ways that their idea could be wrong, and they do experiments to try to get those falsifying results.
IDolators like Dembski do fine at spinning tales, but they never try to get the evidence that would back it up.